Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Connecticut: UCP of Eastern Connecticut 42 Norwich Road Quaker Hill, CT 06375 Phone: (860) 443-3800 Fax: (860) 443-8272 E-mail: email@ucpect.org Web: http://www.ucpect.org UCP of Greater Hartford 80 Whitney Street Hartford, CT 06105 Phone: (860) 236-6201 Fax: (860) 236-6205 E-mail: srne@mindspring.com UCP of Southern Connecticut 94-96 South Turnpike Road (Halycon Office Park) Wallingford, CT 06492 Phone: (203) 269-3511 Fax: (203) 269-7411 E-mail:… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
In Great Britain, there are no opposition proceedings. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Along with Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
In a typically moderate “Mail” piece, Stephen Glover claims that “Amoral judges, shameless celebrities and a Britain that’s coming close to a police state“. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Details emerge of secret ACTA negotiation: privacy, P2P major targets (KEI) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) New Zealand three strikes law comes into effect after 28 February (Ars Technica) (ZDNet) (Techdirt) Global Global - General Job security and data security (ZDNet) Global - Copyright… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
In Van Orden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:33 pm
In coming to this conclusion the Hoge Raad quoted extensively from the standards developed by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in 2013 in Vinter and others v United Kingdom and in 2016 in Murray v The Netherlands but then set them out and developed them further in its own words. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
For example, in the case of Norwood v DPP ([2003] EWHC 1564 (Admin)) the applicant had displayed a poster saying “Islam out of Britain”. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:37 am
" Thus, for instance, U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
Otuo v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain [2017] EWCA Civ 136. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
There was an application in the case of Otuo v Watchtower & Tract Society of Britain on 16 January 2015 before HHJ Parkes QC who gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:36 pm
Backing up a little further, after independence from Great Britain and before the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
Resolution Statement 05756-18 Signature Litigation LLP and Manx Capital Partners Ltd v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation 05679-18 Gos v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication. 04872-18 Muslim Association of Britain v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 04750-18 Wilkinson v Yorkshire Post, 1 Accuracy (2018),… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Google, Facebook and other internet companies could be prosecuted if they do not stop extremist videos from being seen on their websites by people in Britain, as Ministers consider a new law. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am
“Are you collectively happy that Britain’s highest-selling national paper has been criticised by a judge for entrapping a man “solely to create a newspaper story”? [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
Dist. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
A finding of 100% contributory negligence should never be made: see Part III.G.i. [13] Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK), SI 1998/3132, r 44.3(2)(a). [14] Onay v Brown [2009] EWCA Civ 775; Sonmez v Kebabery Wholesale Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1386. [15] Maes Finance Ltd v AL Phillips & Co (1997) The Times, 25 March (Ch D); Lunnun v Singh (1999) The Times, 19 July (CA). [16] See, eg, Pankhurst v White [2006] EWHC 2093 (QB). [read post]
