Search for: "Bush v. Bush"
Results 961 - 980
of 6,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Five years ago today, the Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 4:19 pm
Bush, No. 06-1195 (U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
“That memo has no bearing,” the government contended, on the pending case of Al-Marri v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:50 pm
Thursday's suit is known as Jewel v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:36 am
The second, much shorter memo analyzes the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
Two well-funded gay couples from California, one gay, one lesbian, challenged California's proposition 8 in federal court back in 2008, and the case finally will be orally argued tomorrow at the SCOTUS.Their lawyers, Ted Olson and David Boies of Bush v Gore fame, are well-suited to the task of bringing the couples' privacy-based arguments to the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
Co., 244 P.3d 116 (Colo. 2010). [2] Dreyer v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
(He was not a fan of the blanket policy, at least not in that case, but in Mapp v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 12:00 pm
They were joined by the cities of New York, Washington and Baltimore, and several environmental groups.The case, Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
In his law practice, Zack is perhaps best known for representing Vice President Al Gore in the presidential-election trial of Bush v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 pm
Bush. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:22 pm
Who "the executive authority" is, is -- I would think -- a matter of state law, subject perhaps to some federal constraint on ridiculously arbitrary definitions (akin to the so-called Article II argument in Bush v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 11:25 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:39 pm
Not surprisingly, the group believes this amendment could result in legislation reversing Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 9:02 pm
[Levine @ Patterico] More on Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
Bush and Munaf v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:36 am
Bush (06-1196) and Al Odah v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 8:12 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
