Search for: "Bush v. Bush"
Results 961 - 980
of 6,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 3:55 pm
(In this connection recall Perez v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
Co., 244 P.3d 116 (Colo. 2010). [2] Dreyer v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
Two well-funded gay couples from California, one gay, one lesbian, challenged California's proposition 8 in federal court back in 2008, and the case finally will be orally argued tomorrow at the SCOTUS.Their lawyers, Ted Olson and David Boies of Bush v Gore fame, are well-suited to the task of bringing the couples' privacy-based arguments to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
In his law practice, Zack is perhaps best known for representing Vice President Al Gore in the presidential-election trial of Bush v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:22 pm
Who "the executive authority" is, is -- I would think -- a matter of state law, subject perhaps to some federal constraint on ridiculously arbitrary definitions (akin to the so-called Article II argument in Bush v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 pm
Bush. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
Bush and Munaf v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 8:12 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:36 am
Bush (06-1196) and Al Odah v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In Rasul v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:13 pm
More recently, he used an entire concurring opinion in Trump v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
EPA, 05-1120: The court faults the Bush administration's policy on global warming. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
Bush in support of the respondent, on behalf of seven retired generals and admirals. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am
Bush; Hamdan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:04 pm
Once she saw the panel draw -- O'Scannlain, Randy White, and Ron Wyte (a Bush appointee sitting by designation from the Northern District), I don't think you'd have much hope if you're on the plaintiff's side. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:30 am
First, it is illegitimate for the Court to make decisions based on which political party would be benefited – as the Court did in Bush v. [read post]
