Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,016
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2020, 4:07 am
Of course, a defendant has to agree to be served in this matter – the execution of the waiver form is defendant’s representation that insistence on formal service of has been waived. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, March 23, 2020, 8:30 p.m.: The Lawfare Institute will host a virtual Q&A to discuss the federal government’s legal authorities in a public health crisis. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:50 am
(g) “Textual record” means a record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means that is readable as text. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:12 am
As has already been reported on this blog (see here), the Court of Justice has annulled the decision of the General Court saying that the refusal of EUTM application FACK JU GÖHTE for being (allegedly) contrary to accepted principles of morality was incorrect (judgment of 26 February 2020, C- 240/18P). [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 11:20 am
The GDPR and national data protection laws can, and often do, complicate the matter of sharing personal data, and health data in particular. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
And because such a dispute “stems from the bankruptcy itself,” the Court also has the constitutional authority to enter a final order in this matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Therefore, even the most outrageous speech on matters of public concern must be constitutionally protected. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
P. 56(c); Johns Hopkins Univ. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
In late February, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its long-awaited [the Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek, on which see here, had been released in July 2019] judgment in Constantin Film, C-240/18 P, aka the Fack Ju Göhte case concerning the interpretation of the morality absolute ground in EU trade mark (EUTM) law.The decision is both interesting and important for a number of reasons, including trade mark law, the role of freedom of expression,… [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm
The proclamation will not apply to the following categories of people: lawful permanent resident of the United States; any alien who is the spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident; any alien who is the parent or legal guardian of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident is unmarried and under the age of 21; any alien who is the sibling of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that both are unmarried… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
This means that the movant must demonstrate that there are no genuine and material fact disputes and that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Nor was it was unreasonable.The record contains substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's finding that Zaic is entitled to a compensatory damages award of $5,000 (Executive Law § 297[4][c][iii]; Matter of Framboise Pastry Inc. v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 138 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2016]; see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:47 pm
Chancellor Andre G. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm
A: The prohibition on an employer or related entities filing multiple H-1B cap petitions on behalf of the same beneficiary has not changed and USCIS’ handling of multiple H-1B cap petitions is consistent with 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(G) and Matter of S- Inc., Adopted Decision 2018-02 (AAO Mar. 23, 2018). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:51 pm
G.) [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Joseph G. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
This post summarizes cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court from February 28, 2020. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 10:14 am
Drabinsky in a matter before the Ontario Securities Commission. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 5:54 am
Didden and Christina C. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:32 am
A method of treatment per se is considered excluded subject matter (Article 53(c) EPC). [read post]
