Search for: "DOCTORS ASSOCIATES INC." Results 961 - 980 of 1,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Limelight Networks, Inc., 12-960. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:53 am by Angel Krippner
This in-house team presently includes, among others, a bright young attorney with an LLM from Edinburgh University and years of intensive patent litigation experience at 200-plus attorney law firm; a veteran attorney with a Juris Doctor with honors and years of broad-based litigation experience at 200-plus attorney law firm and a veteran attorney with a Juris Doctor with honors and extensive litigation background at 1,200-plus attorney law firm and 200-plus attorney law firm. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Petitioner presented the testimony of doctor, qualified expert in the field of clinical psychology. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
   ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v MYRIAD GENETICS – an isolated decision? [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am by Sai Vinod
And surely, Hamdard is not the only manufacturer of the drink and claims of any association with plaintiff or its product in the movie is unfounded. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 4:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
There was an allusion to a story on HMA i[Health Management Associates] in December 2012. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
On Friday, May 24, 2013, ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a pharmaceutical company recently acquired by Bausch & Lomb, Inc., pled guilty to violating the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In such circumstances, for doctors’ visits, surgery, and prescription drugs, payment is made not on a per-period basis, but instead is based on the type of procedure or item, such as the surgery or doctor visit actually performed or the prescribed drug, and the amount of payment varies widely based on the type of surgery or the cost of the drug. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The plaintiffs argued that doctors on a "advisory panel" were "agents" of the company, and thus the emails were admissions by a "party opponent." [read post]
21 May 2013, 2:41 pm by Tom Lamb
We start with the June 21, 2011 document request letter sent by Grassley and Baucus to Omar Ishrak, the Chairman and CEO of Medtronic, Inc., which sets forth the reasons for this Senate investigation: We are extremely troubled by press reports suggesting that doctors conducting clinical trials examining the safety and effectiveness of Infuse on behalf of Medtronic were aware that Infuse, a treatment commonly used in spinal surgery, may cause medical complications, but failed to… [read post]