Search for: "District of Columbia v. Heller" Results 961 - 980 of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sure, Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia versus Heller makes it clear that legislators canconstitutionally constrain guns under many conditions, but that may be a very 2008, view. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Silberman alleged that Judge Sullivan (D.D.C.) should not be able to sit on the District of Columbia's judicial selection committee. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
District of ColumbiaInformal interviews are allowed in the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
With the fifth justice, it would no longer be futile.We can expect that the new Court will promptly overrule Citizens United, and with it the argument that the government cannot ban political pamphlets.The Second Amendment, as currently interpreted in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
But when it comes to reaffirming the sensitive places analysis that Justice Thomas had previously signed onto when he joined the Court's opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm by Adam Gillette
If one wants to get rid of the individual right to bear arms, one should work to repeal the Second Amendment rather than hoping that the Supreme Court will overturn its decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 5:59 am by jonathanturley
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Elizabeth Penava
” Blocher notes two landmark Supreme Court cases that have influenced application of the Second Amendment: District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by David Kopel
Indeed, the individual right arguments were so strong that when the Supreme Court finally got around to announcing a new Second Amendment decision, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am by Kate Shaw
Justice Stevens: Of course, some of the memories, the [District of Columbia v.] [read post]