Search for: "Dowe v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Dow Chemical Co., 473 Mich. 63, 701 N.W.2d 684 (Mich. 2005). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
  Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 8:48 am
When he took office, the Dow stood at 2753. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 8:11 am by Clay Hodges
You may have heard the name of this case before, but in most states the admissibility of expert testimony is governed by a Supreme Court case from the 1990s, Daubert v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by Wells Bennett
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]