Search for: "Fall v. State Bar"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
In other words, there is no bar to providing information pursuant to a FOIL request, or otherwise, that falls within one or more of the exceptions that the custodian could rely upon in denying a FOIL request, in whole or in part, for the information or records demanded. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
In other words, there is no bar to providing information pursuant to a FOIL request, or otherwise, that falls within one or more of the exceptions that the custodian could rely upon in denying a FOIL request, in whole or in part, for the information or records demanded. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:50 am
” Similarly, the Appellate Division, Second Department in Adesso Café Bar & Grill, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
That almost certainly means the state court would not rule before sometime next fall, allowing the case to then return to the Ninth Circuit for its consideration of whether to let the case go forward, or to dismiss it based on a finding that no one has “standing” to defend the law in the place of state officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:48 am
That case should be a relief; after considering the weighty constitutional concerns summarized in my preview in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:16 pm
BLUE WATER PARTNERS, INC. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:59 am
In her concurring opinion in US v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
The NY State Health Department has a regulation barring the use of state medicaid funds to cover the cost of gender reassignment and related treatments. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This post includes a little more information about the Geneva Bar Association (Française). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Lamelas notes that Intel Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Both the state trial court and the state intermediate appellate court held that the suit was barred because Congress had repealed the private right of action under TISA, but the California Supreme Court reversed, holding that Congress had not barred state-law suits based on a violation of TISA. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
For a detailed discussion of the facts of this trademark dispute, see my spring 2023 guest post on the Technology & Marketing Law Blog about the Federal Circuit’s opinion in In re Elster and fall 2023 post on this blog after the Supreme Court oral argument in Vidal v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:46 am
Hearsay is not admissible unless it falls within one of the exceptions found in the evidence rules. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
In Cahaly v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Supreme Court this fall. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia last week relied on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to bar Texas from enforcing its photo ID requirement for voters in this fall’s election. [read post]
