Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 961 - 980 of 3,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
Question Presented: Whether actions to cancel or revoke a patent must be tried in Article III Courts with access to a jury under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:06 am by Gregory Dell
Weathers appealed with no satisfaction, and filed a lawsuit on May 27, 2011 in the United States District of South Carolina Greenville Division to see what the Court has to say about Liberty's decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
United States:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-complaint For more on FOSTA:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet Contact:  DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am by Jo Dale Carothers
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 554 U.S. 237, 244–45 (2008); El Paso, 526 U.S. at 479. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm by Rick Hasen
United States of America for more information.” [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. [read post]