Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 961 - 980 of 2,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 6:25 am by Chelsea Gray
The judge ruled that Act 23 violated the 14th Amendment by disproportionally prevented minorities from voting (Frank v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Sloman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, David W. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
The United States relies heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1942 decision, Hines v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Fiut, Harris Beach PLLC, on the brief), Buffalo, New York.Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Frank P. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  Meanwhile, here in the United States, foreign issuers continue to be sued despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
7 May 2006, 9:37 am
In a recent case, two homeowners immigrated from Switzerland and resided legally in the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
(Pl.'s SUMF ¶ 58) On April 7, 2015, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Frank Miller dismissed the case against Plaintiff by nolle prosequi. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
A United States District Court recently issued a decision that denied a plaintiff’s request to impose sanctions against a defendant for destroying evidence before trial on the plaintiff’s pharmacy error claim. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
A United States District Court recently issued a decision that denied a plaintiff’s request to impose sanctions against a defendant for destroying evidence before trial on the plaintiff’s pharmacy error claim. [read post]