Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 961 - 980
of 7,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Fong v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:04 pm
A recent unpublished decision by Bankuptcy Judge Mann of the Southern District of California is a good quick resource for briefing dischargeability actions in her courtroom. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:53 am
Good question, two answers. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 7:53 am
v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
Apple's second California case against Samsung-- filed in 2012, about 10 months after the first Apple v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Likely in response to the California Supreme Court’s December 23, 2016 ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:45 am
California still follows that oldie but not-so-goodie, Frye v . [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
States have largely enacted their FCA laws to mirror the federal FCA, which bars tax claims (e.g., California, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Virginia). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:37 am
Sprinkle Today the California Supreme Court granted Plaintiff Adam Hohnbaum’s petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 1:34 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:36 pm
To wit: One published opinion, total, from the entire California state and federal judiciary.Which is not massively surprising. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:47 am
From the other side of the political spectrum, legislatures in several states including California, Illinois, and Vermont have already called for a constitutional convention to address campaign finance issues. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
See Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
We thus have no need to decide whether Rent-A-Center's five-to-four decision applies to actions brought in state court (see Preston [v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
That’s a good sign that courts citing this precedent will reach conflicting results. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:58 am
Particularly since the California Supreme Court doesn't do a very good job of telling the trial courts how much to weigh such comments, and merely states that they should be viewed "in the totality" of the case and with all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
In New York v. [read post]
