Search for: "In Re Reynolds"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:48 am
The conference closed the next afternoon with the official launch of the Journal of Participatory Medicine, presented to the group by members of the editorial board, re-emphasizing the need expressed in the intervening two days of sessions for clinicians to include patients in all aspects of managing their own care. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 109 N.J. 201, 221-22 (1988). [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Under the current system, you’re supposed to know if you’ll have an offer by August before your 3L year, but in this market you can only believe that promise from a select few firms. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
While others have tried to narrow the holding to justify passing another RFRA, it is educational to read the case: the law was unconstitutional seven ways to Sunday, because Congress attempted to amend the First Amendment unilaterally.Although it was clear that the original and the re-enacted RFRA would threaten civil rights like Title VII (as I testified), the religious lobbies once again prevailed and the Democrats blinked: RFRA was re-enacted in 2000, this time applying solely… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The judge seemed to be flying a kite here, since there was no suggestion that adultery – the subject matter of the particular case – may ever be re-criminalised. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:05 pm
Instapundit [http://www.instapundit.com/] is run by Glenn Reynolds, who teaches at the University of Tennessee Law School (he's also a YLS alum). [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Same problem occurs in trade dress cases—Reynolds v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., both the magistrate and district judges accepted, as a general principle: “An analysis of scientific data may be the subject of a privileged communication. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does it have res judicata effect? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does it have res judicata effect? [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 11:27 am
Ron Reynolds, make up a two-fold strategy to limit natural gas flaring and venting in the state.[1] This pair of bills seeks the development of stricter state standards (HB 896) and an analysis of inspection and maintenance requirements for air quality permits for certain oil and gas facilities including regulatory and/or incentive-based approaches to reduce emissions (HB 897). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:49 am
I re-read it last Sunday, January 1, and must confess that I’d probably drop three or four of these books off my current list of ten favorites. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
(Update: on re-reading this post, I notice I talk about Coase in the past tense only -- he's still alive, and turned 100 in December ). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Image credit: Quantum of the Seas – Hublot via AP Images via NBC News and CruiseHive; rescue boat from Quantum of the Seas – Joshua Reynolds facebook page via the News Daily (Australia); photo of search in water – @cruisingtravellers Instagram via SkyNews (Australia) [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:14 pm
Following the meeting, Stonehouse re-submitted its conditional use permit and vesting tentative map applications for the project. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:04 am
Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, links to a free-marketeer/libertarian rant against universal health care coverage. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:22 am
Can What You're Reading Prove Intent to Commit a Crime? [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:36 am
Eyewitnesses and the 'feeling of knowing'Eyewitnesses in staged test only 8% accurateMore on the fallibility of eyewitness testimonyEyewitnesses miss big changes in their environment, like the person in front of them Study: 88% of police and sheriffs have no written policy on eyewitness ID procedures, even fewer follow best practicesWhy Carl Reynolds would make a lousy witness [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:31 pm
I had my California birth certificate corrected and re-issued, so now it states that I’m non-binary. [read post]
