Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 961 - 980 of 18,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm by Amy Howe
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Gabriella Piscioneri you’re a big tool and you should practice the mantra of ‘shut the fuck up’‘’. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
In AJ v JJ & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1448 the court was required to deal with the situation where the children wished to have their views heard in an abduction case.Lord Justice ThorpeThe Facts: As Lord Justice Thorpe said giving the leading judgment, on the face of it this was a paradigm case for a return order. [read post]
10 Feb 2006, 9:54 pm
Unfortunately, the Court did not re-write it in the clear manner that a taxing statute requires. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
Novelty is not an enemy of justice; we’re judges, not plumbers." [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:26 pm
Mejia was only sentenced to four years in prison, and freaked out about that fact when I got to the portion of the opinion when Justice McKinster described the facts of his offenses. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:02 pm by Amy Howe
“We’re taking a more practical approach,” Curran told the justices, with a “straightforward application” of Landgraf. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:22 am by Kali Borkoski
Justice Kennedy, who authored the majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:59 am by Tejinder Singh
Carhart stepped away from Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Stenberg v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:02 am by Steve Hall
You’re still a member of the team, and the team has to confront the problem. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm by INFORRM
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:58 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: “In many ways, it’s almost like gaslighting,” Wenona Singel says of the Johnson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Conflict of Laws.net had a post on a recent decision of the European Court of Justice, Prism Investments BV v. van der Meer. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
  Nor do Justices Werdegar and Moreno, who dissent.But Justice Baxter makes a nonfrivolous argument to the contrary, and persuades the remainder of the California Supreme Court.It's a tough call. [read post]