Search for: "Jordan v. Jordan" Results 961 - 980 of 2,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 12:24 am
Parasharami, Finality over Choice: Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:28 am
In our article, forthcoming in the Journal of Financial Economics, we use the US Supreme Court case in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:38 am
Nike alleges that defendants are “manufacturing, distributing, offering for sale, and/or selling the Nike Trademarks in the form of counterfeit shoes bearing exact copies or colorable imitations of the Nike Trademarks,” including Nike’s NIKE, SWOOSH DESIGN, NIKE AIR, AIR JORDAN, and JUST DO IT registered trademarks.Nike also alleges it sent cease-and-desist letters demanding that defendants stop making sales, but defendants’ sales… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Within the nonprecedential decision in PRIVACASH v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
Defendant testified that while incarcerated for a prior conviction, he purchased a state tort claim for $5.00 from another inmate named Lock Jordan. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:20 am by Anna Christensen
Jordan, and we have updated our case index for OT10 to include new pages for those cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:21 am
Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co. (2000), 77 B.C.L.R. (3d) 44 and Jordan. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, “Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin break down the 5-4 decision in Herrera v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
On Friday afternoon, the justices added four cases to their merits docket, including Seila Law v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Following the March 30th "mystery document", it now appears that that the attorneys for both sides in Elektra v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
The decision, dividing the Circuit Court 2 to 1, came in the case of Arar v. [read post]