Search for: "Kelly v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Kelly currently sits on the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
” Kelly’s other death penalty cases were Winfied v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
In 2009, the court held in Teal v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:45 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm
Kelly, 420 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), ten days of exposure to chemicals (chemical exposure cases apply the same principles); see, also, Moore v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
”Citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, rearg denied 96 NY2d 854, the Appellate Division concluded that the penalty imposed, termination, was not "so disproportionate to the offense[s] as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" and thus did not constitute an abuse of discretion and dismissed Tamsen’s appeal.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00785.htm _______________________The Discipline Book - A… [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Kelli M. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Kelly-Zurian v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:31 am
In a 2013 decision, Kadi v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Birmingham’s stated policy was considered by the court to be in excess of statutory requirements. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
While North Carolina has had its own share of assaults with unusual deadly weapons, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
While North Carolina has had its own share of assaults with unusual deadly weapons, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:52 am
Based on its decision in Edry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 2:15 am
People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
State of Maryland). [read post]
