Search for: "Leone v. Leone"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
I should start out by saying that the Redstate author, Leon H. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), and Malley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 920, 923 (1984); Malley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:54 am
The State argued that “probable cause supported the warrant but, if not, exclusion of the evidence is inappropriate because of the Leon good faith exception. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:31 am
” De Leon Vasquez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
This is especially true in CPLR article 78 proceedings (Matter of Leone v Blum, 73 A.D.2d 252, 274, mot for lv to app granted 50 N.Y.2d 1042). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
This is especially true in CPLR article 78 proceedings (Matter of Leone v Blum, 73 A.D.2d 252, 274, mot for lv to app granted 50 N.Y.2d 1042). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:51 am
Dita, Inc., Oppositions Nos. 91167828 and 91170265 [Section 2(d) consolidated opposition to registration of DITA for jewelry, leather goods, and clothing, based on the alleged prior use of the identical mark and the mark DITA DE LEON for the same "categories" of goods].August 25, 2011 - 2 PM: Ahold Licensing, S.A. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm
Cain and last session's ruling in Connick v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 4:21 am
Bluth is the rare case in which the solemn statements of Leon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:29 am
Parker v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:32 am
Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) (magistrate error in finding probable cause); Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:53 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:47 am
Inc. v Vigilant Ins. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:28 am
Kacak v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
Arizona v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
Contrary to the dissent's conclusion, we need only determine that American has a cause of action, not whether it has stated one (see Leon, 84 NY2d at 88; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275, 372 N.E.2d 17, 401 N.Y.S.2d 182). [read post]
