Search for: "McCarthy's Case"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 7:04 am
As for the relative significance of effects, the court quoted McCarthy on trademark’s twin goals of “protect[ing] property” in trademarks and protecting consumers from confusion. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:27 pm
Some applications in the case had been signed by Dr Eliand, others by ‘Charles Henry’, but some by Mr McCarthy over the course of it between 2012 and 2014. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
McCarthy discussed here. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
With Dulles, I suppose the case is harder. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
With Dulles, I suppose the case is harder. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
McCarthy’s full bull, at the link. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
”The court, Justices McCarthy and Devine dissenting, annulled the Comptroller’s decision and remitted the matter to him “for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
E. coli O157:H7 is responsible for over 90% of the cases of HUS that develop in North America. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
Professor McCarthy responds below to the comments on this TTABlog post regarding his criticism of the TTAB's dilution analysis. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:36 pm
The Little Book of Movie Law by Carol Robertson: KF 4298 .R63 2012 The chapters in this book are called “Reels” and cover everything from the early days of cinema to the silent era to the development of sound to the McCarthy era to the rise of independent producers to obscenity and the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:09 am
” The letters were the same; both had style variations on the “o,” a heart and a diacritical; they both used uniform casing (all caps and all lower case); they were both in white print on a dark maroon background. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
Thomas McCarthy has been a consistent critic of the TTAB's analysis in dilution cases, particularly the Board's failure to properly consider the issue of "impairment" or "damage" arising from the alleged dilution. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 8:56 am
(Although I was fortunate to learn criminal law from a new and then very young Professor Alan Dershowitz.)So I am reluctant to enter the prosecutorial debate between FBI Director James Comey and a former colleague of his, Andrew McCarthy, over just what kind of charges each would recommend be brought (or, in Comey's case, not be brought) against former First Lady, U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Indeed, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy acknowledged they are trying to bring down her presidential bid, and they have effectively lowered her poll numbers–and are still pursuing her. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:44 am
Jan. 30, 1996) (same where affidavit filer didn’t disclose that a challenge had been threatened but not filed); 3 McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Comp. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:50 am
You said that no reasonable prosecutor would have brought a case against Sec. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
McCarthy, 385 Mass. 160, 430 N.E.2d 1195 (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts 1982), we recognized a limited exception for when the grand jury `fail[ ] to hear any evidence of criminal activity by the defendant. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:45 am
For example, did David Petraeus' case meet the criteria Comey articulated this morning. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 10:07 am
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy states in her blog, “The dangers of inaction were never more stark than in the case of asbestos, a chemical known to cause cancer through decades of research. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
We only consider the `evidence introduced up to the time the Commonwealth rested its case. [read post]
