Search for: "Michaels v. Superior Court" Results 961 - 980 of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
The motion filed by defendant Michael Roman seeks primarily to do just that – to disqualify Willis and Wade from further participation in this case. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
But the court cannot today take additional steps or force the prosecution to do more. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo MSN – Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 11/5/2019 A critical witness in the impeachment inquiry offered Congress substantial new testimony, revealing he told a top Ukrainian official that the country likely would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville ordered Holly LaBerge and the attorney general’s office to each pay $10,000 to cover the litigation expenses of the plaintiff, former ethics commission Executive Secretary Stacy Kalberman. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am by Elie Mystal
Will’s editorial in the Washington Post argues that SCOTUS should grant cert in the Fisher v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:11 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Peck, Juez Magistrado del Distrito Sur de Nueva York; y Matthew V. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:48 pm by Darren O'Donovan
This has elicited the usual philosophical responses, none more eloquent than our own Supreme Court in AG v O’Brien, that such policies ‘involve the State in moral defilement’. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
 The same reluctance that infected federal courts appears to have affected antitrust appropriations by Congress too. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Office of Personnel Management The Bulk Data for Me but Not for Thee Award: Los Angeles Police Department I Wanted to Clarify That My A** is Covered Award: White House The Transparently Proud of Destroying Public Records Awards: Michael Gableman The Ancient Art of Dodging Accountability Award: Cyber Ninjas The Transparency Tax Award: Mendocino County The Burn After Reading Award: Immigration and Customs Enforcement The MisFIRE in All Directions Award: Irvington Township (I'm Not… [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Against this background the author discusses, in the context of refusal to supply abuses both in and outside an IP context, the operationalisation of the criterion of harm to consumers (section IV) before concluding (section V). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
  The various issues raised by the commission’s subpoenas and other requests for information are complex, and largely unanswered by the courts. [read post]