Search for: "People v. Clark" Results 961 - 980 of 1,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
  That said, it is not inherently unethical to give people uncertain information — even when the information is potentially devastating and even if it’s not “clinically actionable. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
Norovirus is highly contagious and can spread anywhere people gather or food is served, making people sick with vomiting and diarrhea. [16]“Norovirus outbreaks from contaminated food in restaurants are far too common. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am by Ackerman Law Office
 Whittin v Luck In Whittin v Luck people began renting house in May 2009. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  The police are paid to arrest people. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Both Supreme Court case law and sensible campus rules have additional requirements of reasonableness and adequate alternative channels.Consider the 1984 case of Clark v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am by Carolina Bracken
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
After 1967, when Thurgood Marshall replaces Tom Clark, there are six liberal votes on most [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]