Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 961 - 980 of 1,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Smith’s pick from Louisiana, Dale Cox, is quoted as saying “[i] think we need to kill more people. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am by Steven Eversole
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am by Steven Eversole
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:05 pm
 If you were one of those people and missed a batch of Katposts, you can check them all out below.Once again the IPKat is indebted to his good and amiable friend Alberto Bellan, who has sampled all the posts and has this to report:* A Kat visits #INTA15: PreludeThe International Trademark Association (INTA) has held its 137th Meeting in San Diego this year, deep in the sunny south of California. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  I really wish people wouldn’t treat copyright uncertainty as so much more uncertain than other legal regimes. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
Some people think that too many people are on vacation in August. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
  In Pinner [21] microbiologic survey of refrigerated foods specimens obtained from households with listeriosis patients, 36 percent of the beef samples and 31 percent of the poultry samples were contaminated with Listeria. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada decided in 2013 that a judge could largely copy from the parties’ submissions in his reasons: Cojocaru v. [read post]