Search for: "People v. Score" Results 961 - 980 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
  In just the last few months, for example, opionions include People by James v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
 Or at the very least, we know that a lot of people and organizations think so. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But it should be fairly reliable, and should thus diminish the damage that the AI program may do to people's reputations. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
As I note in that same column, corpus linguistics has also been used in other appellate opinions and was formally endorsed by the Michigan Supreme Court in the 2016 case People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 2:31 am
Realtime (chat) v. long-term (book, blog); solo (writing/programming) v. collaborative. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm by Moderator
In this regard, 65.5% was directed to large banks, 12.6% small and 21.9% was indifferent.On satisfaction with the care and services, keep in mind clarifies the polling firm, that the Panamanian is condescending and thus slightly higher scores than they actually think.In that sense the 420 people surveyed by 7% scored excellent attention from banks, 49% called it good and 38.9% as fair.The same question, but addressed to the bankers, reported only 2.8% as excellent, 64.5%… [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 Big majorities of the Court have been wrong before (obvious examples: Plessy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am by Joseph Fishkin
(Democrats have more material to work with on this score. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]