Search for: "Rank v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 3:39 am
(Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:11 pm
., the Sunflower State has joined the ranks of 37 other states by enacting a Shield Law protecting journalists from having to disclose confidential sources.Democratic Gov. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:11 pm
State of California. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
This morning I've been reading the oral arguments (pdf) from Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:47 pm
The Sixth Circuit is set to re-decide Lindke v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:44 pm
This week's Supreme Court ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
The Court reaches this conclusion primarily upon reliance on United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
Even with their ranks diminished by staffing disruptions caused by the pandemic, consular officers continue to provide assistance to United States citizens, including through the ongoing evacuation of many Americans stranded overseas. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
The case only gets a #6 ranking because, while California is a big state, it's also a peculiar one, so impact elsewhere will be slight. 7. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 8:52 am
National Football Scouting, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
So local connection determined priority between those otherwise ranked of the same priority (apparently not including waiting time). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
” However, employees of a political subdivision of the State are not within the ambit of §80-a of the Civil Service Law which applies only to the suspension or demotion of employees of the State as the employer upon the abolition or reduction of State positions in the non-competitive class. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm
On appeal, the Eighth Circuit agreed, stating the transfer brought “only minor changes in working conditions. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:42 am
However, in Virk v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:22 am
In his view, the Advocate General stated that only Class III obesity would likely amount to a disability. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:58 am
Redmond v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:02 am
From Arcella v. [read post]