Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 961 - 980
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
BOM, et al., Index Number 22937/2009, a residential foreclosure proceeding. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:39 pm
In the case of Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am
But for Justice Scalia et al., this is not a problem. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
Robinson et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
In the final analysis, Infante’s sloppy narrative review could not stand in the face of obviously inconsistent epidemiologic data. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
It thus stands to reason that Congress meant for those provisions to apply in every State as well. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:49 am
As it currently stands, the 2nd Circuit will be reviewing the New York judge's decision with the California case awaiting a result, too.More here http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/1972-and-all-that-but-does-turtles-win.html and here http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/turtles-probe-murky-soup-of-pre-1972-us.html and here Flo & Eddie, Inc., v Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al UNITED STATES… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:33 pm
” 19 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 4511 (2d ed. [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
Here’s the timeline:Tariff is filed June 2, 2007Board Hearing April 27 to May 11, 2010Board Decision July 6, 2012Judicial Review Application Filed August 7, 2012Hearing by Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) November 19, 2013 Decision by Federal Court of Appeal February 24, 2014Parties File Settlement March 21, 2014 On April 17, 2014 the Board ruled that: Those parts of Re:Sound Tariff No. 6.B (Use of Recorded Music to Accompany Physical Activities) that… [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:21 am
UCF ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondent. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm
Stewart Parnell et al was close enough to perfection to easily pass muster. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:10 am
The Chicago Housing Authority, et al., 2015 IL App (1st) 133788. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm
Vincent Vertin et al. is “destined to be cited as a seminal ruling for its historical and doctrinal analysis of important principles of Delaware corporate law. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:00 am
Pneumo Abex, LLC, et al. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:59 am
Town of Collierville v Town of Collierville Zoning Board of Appeals, 2015 WL 1606712 (TN App. 4/7/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.tncourts.gov/courts/court-appeals/opinions/2015/04/07/town-collierville-et-al-v-town-collierville-board-zoning-etFiled under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am
In Continental Automotive GmbH et al v. iBiquity Digital Corporation, the plaintiff held a license from the patent holder. [read post]
