Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2012, 2:20 pm
It admits applicants to practice law in California state courts. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
State of California (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d, 556.) [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:24 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court of California considered an employer’s drug policies in conjunction with an employee’s lawful use of medical marijuana (Ross v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Exercise offederal jurisdiction is therefore improper.CONCLUSIONFor these reasons, this courtVACATES AND REMANDS TO THE DISTRICTCOURT WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO REMAND THECASE TO CALIFORNIA STATE COURT [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California released orders in civil rights cases, among them: In Ruiz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
Superior Court, S166350, one of a number of meal and rest break class actions pending in the state. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:38 pm
On May 29, 2019, the California State Assembly overwhelmingly passed AB 5, a bill seeking to codify Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
Also, two years ago, a California Appellate Court in Juror #1 v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:43 am
Superior Court, 273 P.3d 513, 527 (Cal. 2012), California remains a hotbed of employment class litigation as a recent spate of cases reflects. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 8:55 am
Superior Court, California used the sliding scale to support jurisdiction over a class action by mostly nonresident members for a drug not made in California. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:16 pm
Superior Court, 72 Cal.App.4th 214 (Cal.App. 1999)). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., A114623 (Cal. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
Superior Court, S222732] What does it mean that a California employer is to provide “one’s day rest in seven”? [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455-456 [decisions of the California Supreme Court are binding upon and must be followed by all the state courts of California].). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
The cases (and the issues presented, as stated on the court’s website) that will be argued on November 8 and 9 are: Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:04 am
The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Cal., No. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 6:39 am
One recent case out of California (a state that also recognizes the doctrine of respondeat superior) reveals how these are not always straightforward matters. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:08 am
Superior Court of San Diego County (Hohnbaum) (2008) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
