Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 961 - 980 of 12,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by req@quintilone.com
  On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court reversed a Class Certification order in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:14 pm by Michael O'Hear
 The state’s most prominent victims’ organization, Crime Victims United of California, was quick to condemn the decision and predict the worst for public safety. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
How, if he becomes president, might the civil war begin, since there will certainly be no Fort Sumter to signal the beginning, and the California vote for secession apparently won't take place until 2019. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
    The latest California Verdict Search (reports available in paper version only) reports a defense verdict in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (that's San Diego) in a case called Wawanesa General Insurance Company v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Interior (Land into Trust; Alaska Tribes)United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am by Greg Mersol
Ct. 1773 (2017), the United States Supreme Court addressed an effort by plaintiffs to bring 600 product liability claims, mostly by non-Californians, in the form of a mass tort action in California state court. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:55 am by James Goodman
StubHub, Inc., et al., 2:17-cv-04062-SVW-SS, the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed almost all the remaining claims against StubHub and the other defendants. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:17 am
Although the Meso Scale Diagnostics decision confirms, at least under Delaware law, the long-standing view of many practitioners that a reverse triangular merger does not result in an assignment by operation of law, it does not directly affect the contrary position taken by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in SQL Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]