Search for: "State v. Bridges" Results 961 - 980 of 2,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
Law Lessons from STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF C.D., App. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:42 pm by Julie Lam
  The People Should Decide’s proposed amendment would require a popular vote before any new international bridge could be constructed. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:15 pm
"By the rude bridge that arched the flood,Their flag to March breezes unfurled;Here the embattled factors stood,And heard the T'SNOT heard 'round the world. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am by CMS
The relevant provision of the New York Convention – article V(1)(a) – can be found in section 103(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act, and states that “the recognition or enforcement of the award may be refused if the person against whom it is invoked proves (…) that the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law to which the parties subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 12:29 pm by Gene Quinn
Several weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
  This case looks a bit like Bridges v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place, and largely endorsing Texas’s scheme to insulate its law from the fundamental protections of Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson said some of Apple's claim construction and validity arguments were untimely.ALJ Bhattacharyya's decisions are sealed for the time being, but the following screenshot from the ITC docket shows the outcome (click on the image to enlarge):This is not a good pretrial outcome for Apple.Starting Monday, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas will hold an Ericsson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” The Mercatus Center’s podcast The Bridge focuses on Kisor v. [read post]