Search for: "State v. Brooks"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
State of New York, decided on April 16. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:38 am
The Court thus adopted the "predatory pricing" requirements of Brooke Group Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:33 pm
The case, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:33 am
Cruikshank and United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:45 am
As another panel of this same court recognized a few years ago, in Brooks v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
Barnett's critique of "minimum rationality" when used mindlessly to uphold rent seeking regulation like that in Williamson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
The case is Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
Perhaps the most important exclusion from patentability, discussed further below, is India’s Section 3(d).The authors cited Pfizer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:11 am
Brooks, Judge Representing Appellant (Defendant): Donald Eugene McDaniel, pro se. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Cooper and Juliette V. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
