Search for: "State v. City of York"
Results 961 - 980
of 9,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2022, 6:21 am
A State Supreme Court Justice a few weeks ago struck down New York City's requirement that all City and private employees must be vaccinated for COVID-19. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
Every year I give a lecture to other New York accident and personal injury lawyers across New York State on the issue of "Municipal Liability". [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:25 am
Protection of the City of New York, (NY Ct. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:43 pm
The plaintiff is asserting a cause of action for violation of the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL), N.Y. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:19 am
Practice point: A New York resident cannot bring a proceeding under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) against a foreign corporation for alleged discrimination that occurred outside New York. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
2) Whether the Second Circuit misinterpreted the “fact” discussion in this Court’s majority opinion in City of Sherrill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:11 pm
For better or worse, the answer is no, but does that mean those who post Revenge Porn are free from arrest or prosecution in New York City or New York State? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
NYC not required to make “increased-take-home-pay" retirement contributions for police officers and firefighters appointed after June 30, 2009 Lynch v City of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 04873, Court of AppealsThe bottom line of a very comprehensive opinion in which the Court of Appeals addressed whether Retirement and Social Security Law §480 (b) requires the City of New York (the City) to make "Increased-Take-Home-Pay"… [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:28 am
In McMillan v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
The individual, employed by the New York City Housing Authority, had violated the Authority's written policy prohibiting its staff members running for political office in a partisan election.Noting that “It is well settled that "[v]iolation of an employer's reasonable policies may constitute disqualifying misconduct," the Appellate Division said that the Authority’s guidelines were established “to assure compliance with the Hatch… [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
In the case, a New York state trial court held that New York City's public accommodation law requires Yeshiva University to officially recognize as a student organization an LGBTQ group, YU Pride Alliance. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:35 am
The industry argues that the City law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause because, in practice, the City law favors New York City franchises over out-of-state franchises. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:17 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am
Wooster v Queen City Landing, LLC 2017 WL 1822611 (NYAD 4 Dept. 5/5/017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
& Computer Services v State of New York, 42 NY2d 289. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authoritySeabrook v City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 09471, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNorman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:41 pm
Matter of Transport Workers Union Local 100, v New York City Tr. [read post]
