Search for: "State v. Dodd"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 3:17 pm
The result of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am
In addition, Dodd-Frank prohibits an adviser from registering with the SEC under the Advisers Act if it (a) has assets under management of less than $100 million, and (b) is required to register in the state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business and, if registered, would be subject to examination by such state. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:03 pm
To recap, the Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
MORRISON V. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Terra Sec v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
Dodd, 111 Wn.2d 174, 178-79, 759 P.2d 455 (1988); Taylor v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
Gutpa v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 6:16 pm
Bayview Financial, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and Gifaldi v. [read post]
DOL ARB Holds Sarbanes-Oxley Covers Claims by Employees of Subsidiaries of Publicly-traded Companies
1 Apr 2011, 10:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
The amendments are driven by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requirement that such credit-rating references be replaced with other standards. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:21 pm
School Dist. v Moody’s, 175 F3d 848.), or by investors who suffered losses after their highly rated securities failed (Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. 651 F. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
Tweet Image via Wikipedia In Pezza v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm
That case was Ameziane v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
Questions about the invitation may be phoned to Ivan V. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm
For example, the regulatory reform law essentially reversed the Supreme Court case Watters v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
In the press release announcing the complaint against the DHB independent directors, the Director of the Commission’s Division of Enforcement, Robert Khuzami, stated, “We will not second-guess the good-faith efforts of directors. [read post]
