Search for: "State v. H. L. C." Results 961 - 980 of 1,361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by Robert A. Epstein
"As a general matter, the Guidelines specify sources of income as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony and separate… [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
Atlas (see Item 6(C)(5) and Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan) Court Procedures of District Judge Lee H. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Int'l Game Tech., 184 F.3d 1339, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:23 pm by Alexander J. Davie
Code § 1301:6-3-01(L) exempts from the definition of the term “investment adviser” any person who “during the course of the preceding twelve months: (a) [h]as had fewer than fifteen clients;  (b) [d]oes not hold himself out generally to the public as an investment adviser; and (c) [h]as clients consisting solely of… “[a]ccredited investors” as defined in… Regulation D…”… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by Lawrence Solum
  And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]