Search for: "State v. Hughes"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruling in 1985 in Hughes v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm
In the case of Ewing v Crown Court sitting at Cardiff and Newport ([2016] EWHC 183 (Admin)) confirms an important feature of the open justice principle: that permission is not needed in order to take notes in Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
Sumption concluded that the test is as set out in R v Hughes: there must be “at least some act or omission in the control of the car which involves some element of fault, whether amounting to careless/inconsiderate driving or not, and which contributes in some more than minimal way to the death”. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:18 am
Several weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Redline Detection, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
And while the Sunflower State won big this week in Kansas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
It was wham, bam, thank you Supreme Court of the United States for American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm
Hugh Harrison. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
The second instance involves another BBC journalist, Roland Hughes, and his story about his part in helping another 'lifted' photograph to go viral without the author's permission. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
It stated that the claimant had been passing confidential information to ex-employees of CSP who were working for a rival agency and that criminal proceedings were being considered (for the full text, see [4]). [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:42 am
Citing the 2015 Florida Supreme Court decision in Sanislo v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am
Zimmer — need for clarification of federal district judge’s authority to award enhanced money damages for patent infringement (Cases consolidated for one hour of argument) Wednesday, February 24: Hughes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
His approach: draw attention away from Sprint Fidelis by focusing on Hughes and Stengel. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
Owens: Crying wolf over the Trans-Pacific Partnership https://t.co/WQDJOIwsAI Hugh Stephens The TPP’s Intellectual Property Provisions: The “Worst Public Policy Decision in the Country’s History”? [read post]
