Search for: "State v. Little Bear"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
While HHS touted the decision as allowing states significant choice, as outlined in more detail in the paragraphs that follow, in reality the parameters within which HHS will require states to exercise this choice provides little flexibility for states to control costs by adopting a limited EHB package. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:07 pm
But isn't there at least an academic argument that where different provisions of the Constitution refer to the same entity, it makes little sense to apply different methodologies to interpreting those distinct provisions? [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
However, if the US trade mark can also be considered a copyright work or reproduces a commercial name, there is a good chance that the opposition or cancellation procedure will succeed.Cuba is a member of the Paris Convention but it is difficult to prove that a mark is well-known in Cuba when products bearing US trade marks have not been present on the Cuban market for many years.A little-known Convention 'General Washington'An interesting and important exception to… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
This Kat is a little amused, recalling the ONEL case and the debate in the European Union as to whether use in one little corner of its territory should be regarded as genuine use in the EU.Around the weblogs. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
A recitation of the facts in Jesinoski v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
In Valente v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:40 pm
" Cobbledick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Any system that inflicts this kind of damage on an innocent man bears the burden of clear justification. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
Redhail, and Turner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:37 am
v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
