Search for: "State v. Peters" Results 961 - 980 of 5,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
New Zealand In the case of Peters v Attorney-General sued on behalf of Ministry of Social Development [2021] NZCA 355 the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a decision rejecting his privacy claims. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
There is probably much I have missed, but the sketch above is a beginning. [1] Peter H. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
If Peter raises the First Amendment as a defense, he loses--even though Deirdre is invoking the power of the state (in the form of the judge) to obtain an order to Peter that he pay damages.Some readers at this point might be thinking: what about Shelley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
On 25 June 2021 Meade J handed down his decision in the second of a series of trials listed as part of the Optis v Apple UK action ([2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat); a link the judgment is here). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Ron DeSantis and a panel of scientists were discussing COVID, because it "contradicts the consensus of local and global health authorities regarding the efficacy of masks to prevent the spread of Covid-19″—the scientists apparently stated that children should not wear masks, and the CDC calls for children age 2 and above to wear masks.[57] But as recently as August 2020 the World Health Organization took a different view for 2-to-5-year-olds (which it said shouldn't… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook, Namecheap and GoDaddy win a Section 230 dismissal of a defamation claim. * State v. [read post]