Search for: "Steel v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 2,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
The [lower] court found [claimant’s willingness to help produce steel, even when it is a raw product to be used in arms, but not tank turrets] inconsistent with Thomas’ stated opposition to participation in the production of armaments. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:41 am by Simon Lester
 Here's the full context (without footnotes): 7.29 Korea relies upon the Appellate Body report in US – Softwood Lumber V  to argue that the United States acted inconsistently with the first sentence of Article 2.4.2 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Johnson v Steele, heard 29 October 2014 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Coast to Coast Energy, Inc. v Gasarch,149 AD3d 485, 486 (1st Dept 2017) (citations omitted); see also Cotia (USA) Ltd. v Lynn Steel Corp. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:12 pm by HowardGutman
District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami – Weiss, et al., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 (ii) Development of Green Hydrogen Projects inside the Hubs in an integrated manner to allow pooling of resources and achievement of scale (iii) Enhance the cost-competitiveness of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives vis-a-vis fossil-based alternatives (iv) Maximize production of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives in India within the stated financial support (v) Encourage large-scale utilization and exports of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives (vi)… [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 11:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
He explained how the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]