Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
Department of Agriculture, the Court, in an opinion by Justice Thomas, held that a couple who produce raisins in California was permitted to challenge an agricultural fine against them as an unconstitutional “taking” in a U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm
The ACLU of Northern California will press ahead in Haskell v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
For more on Dockery v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
It's going to take you forever. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Especially since he'd only been admitted to the California Bar around three years before these offenses. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
It quietly began implementing Plan B while Plan A (injunctions) was falling apart:Last summer it accepted Apple's offer to take a license on court-determined terms to Motorola's cellular SEPs in Germany. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:41 pm
Landmark Missouri v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Morales The inspiration for the bill that is currently being considered in California is the case of People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:07 pm
For instance, Suburban Express takes issue with a statement of Reddit that they are "likely to sue you," saying that given their number of riders it is actually statistically unlikely they will sue you. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
California, 384 US 757 (1966). [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
The answer is yes, but, according to California law, it must be a "qualifying offense", meaning that the prior must have the same elements as a conviction for DUI in California. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
The first High Court hearing in Lord McAlpine’s defamation claim against Sally Bercow will take place on Tuesday, as the Guardian reports here. 25 Bedford Row reports that John Cooper QC, instructed by Pinder Reaux, has obtained a “six figure settlement” for the actress Lynda Bellingham over online statements made online about the Claimant and her husband. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
“Absolutely; it shouldn’t be eligible for the Mark [of USDA inspection] – ought to be treated the same as lungs,” wrote one agency veterinarian based in California. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:20 am
California; and Snyder v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
LEXIS 42064, Jan. 31, 2013) and dismissed a habeas corpus petition brought by an inmate who was denied parole after refusing to take the Sex Offender Counseling and Treatment Program because assuming responsibility for the offense in the program would require him to lie in violation of his Jehovah's Witness religious beliefs.In Mobley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: 'Gideon v. [read post]
