Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
These four Michigan Supreme Court justices - Justice Young (up for election this November), along with Justice Corrigan, Markman and Taylor - essentially created an entirely new auto law in this state with Kreiner. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:25 am
id=1497436 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana) 1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of MontanaSK Rossi, Owner, Central House Strategies Gary Mitchell, AttorneySession Moderator: James Taylor, Managing Attorney,… [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:08 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 5:53 am
And 75(v) cannot be taken away. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Fogle v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 2:29 pm
In two prior cases, Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
* Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:01 am
The style of the case is State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
”***In Conetta, State Supreme Court Judge Lockman suggested that if a school district wishes to stop granting tenure, it could make such a demand in the course of collective negotiations authorized by Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
ShareThe argument Tuesday in Cantero v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Suppose that NFIB v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm
Six years after Richards, the court in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 8:56 am
An example, in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
