Search for: "Thomas Frame" Results 961 - 980 of 1,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
This paper seeks to expose what is framed as the “micro-miscarriages of justice”. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
This paper seeks to expose what is framed as the “micro-miscarriages of justice”. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:44 pm by Nietzer
The time frames for post-acquisition integration are quite tight. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Holder frames his words carefully:There's a certain racial component to this for some people. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:39 am by Nietzer
This gives a compliance practitioner some idea of the time frames involved in the process. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am by Amy Howe
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Steve Klepper discusses the possibility that Justice Clarence Thomas could be questioning whether the Court’s decision in Citizens United applies to the states. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
U.S. ruling was a letdown, notably absent was a liberal concurrence defending broad treaty power against critique of Thomas, Scalia et al [Noah Feldman, Bloomberg View, Peter Spiro/Opinio Juris, Julian Ku and John Yoo, David Golove And Marty Lederman] Think before you ratify: in controlled experiment, framing proposed change in domestic law as “required by human rights treaty” boosted support especially among Republicans [Spiro/OJ; more on international human rights… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:35 am by Eric Turkewitz
This article didn’t sit well with Thomas Jandl of Washington, who wrote in to the Times in a letter published in yesterday’s sports section. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:23 pm by Eleanor Lackman
The way the Court framed the issue in the case speaks volumes about the fundamental problem that the Court saw in Aereo:  it was “technologically complex,” and more so than it needed to be in order to perform its function of delivering live broadcast television over the Internet and mobile devices. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
 The antidote to this contagion is by framing copyright as a property right. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am by Jason Rantanen
Yet Thomas’s presentation of Mayo, his framing of the Court’s prior precedent, and his application of Mayo to Alice’s claims all indicate that Alice endorses the last aspect of Mayo: that a claim must do more than set forth a fundamental principle and add a generic instruction to “apply it. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
”  As framed by the petition, the case presents the question whether, consistent with the First Amendment, conviction of threatening another person requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:37 am by Thomas Maira
This post was written by Thomas Maira and Joshua Leventhal In an effort to expedite the litigation process, reduce court costs and to offer contracting parties an alternative to arbitration, the New York State Supreme Court Commercial Division has adopted an “accelerated adjudication” rule, effective as of June 2, 2014, for all disputes exceeding $500,000. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” This argument, in fact, is the target of Thomas Piketty’s now-famous book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:37 am by Markham Erickson
  It frames Kiowa relative to a long line of jurisprudence that supports the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 We all know Justice Thomas’ answer – but he is an extremist on the issue. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It has been long recognized that “ethical system[s] must be framed as to prevent judges from being activists, mavericks, [and] publicity-seekers”.[93] In view of this, judicial fundraising presents ethical problems as it can directly or indirectly result in a judge being publically associated with an organization as its advocate. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
The book describes the ways in which the on-going confrontations between the president, Congress and the Court framed the fundamental constitutional choices voters faced as they went to the polls in 1864, 1866, and 1868. [read post]