Search for: "United States v. Andrews" Results 961 - 980 of 2,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am by Jan Baran
For example, contrary to President Barack Obama’s histrionic warning in his State of the Union speech, Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
  And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports that “Monday’s ruling added clarity to a powerful defense employed by drug makers that product liability claims brought under state law are preempted by the actions of a federal agency, because federal law generally trumps state law under the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:59 pm by Leila Wozniak
 The notice followed the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in ACA International v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm by David Kopel
In McCulloch, Chief Justice Marshall found it necessary to spend many pages applying the doctrine of incidental powers before he could reach the other issues about the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am by Susan Brenner
Defendant’s Response to United States’ Opposition to Motion to Suppress Evidence, U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Independent MP, Andrew Bridgen, has said he will sue the former Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, for £100,000 in defamation over a tweet in which Hancock accused him of spreading “antisemitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
A third son, Andrew, 18, also sat in the car and witnessed the murders, but he was not shot. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines, and Manrique v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:19 am by Susan Brenner
The 9th Circuit explained that it had reached the same conclusion in interpreting similar language in other criminal statutes: In United States v. [read post]