Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 961 - 980 of 9,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
“They are ‘owned by, produced by or for, or . . . under the control of the United States Government. . . . [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:28 pm by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Carroll, and Bayla Ostrach Health law and policy in the United States are, in many senses, driven by a desire to control. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 8:57 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
In 2021, a Ninth Circuit three-justice panel held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) didn’t preempt AB 51, and thus California could enforce its prohibition on mandatory employment arbitration agreements (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am by Chris Skelton and Kara Simon
The United States scarcely resembles the fledgling republic that emerged at the end of the 18th century. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
’”Alito noted that defenders of Roe had failed to discharge their burden of showing “that the Court had the authority to decide how abortion may be regulated in the States. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Its ranking is kept down in large part by its worst-in-the-country unemployment insurance tax system and by its property tax system, which ranks 45th (due to business property taxes and estate tax burdens) despite attempts to cap residential property tax burdens. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-163Issues: (1) Whether the limits on agency deference announced in Kisor v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The court ruled that the benefits of the law were "limited" since the law could do nothing to stop the transmission of communications from outside the United States, and yet the burdens were "extreme" because the law affected internet users everywhere.[22] The court further ruled that the law violated the extraterritoriality prong because by the very act of applying its law to the internet, New York "projected its law into other states… [read post]