Search for: "Walker v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 2,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 12:30 pm by Daily Record Staff
Walker, Appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Carroll County of the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
United States was not, after oral argument, much of a surprise. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
One fair method is to apportion away the profits attribuable to the popularity of defendants or the use of features in the public domain or similar to features in the public domain” (see Walker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 5:25 am by Eric Goldman
Walker, 490 F.3d 239, 252 (2d Cir. 2007) (quoting Best Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:17 pm by Walter Olson
Hans Bader of CEI, at Law and Liberty: As the Washington state supreme court noted in Rickert v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am by Schachtman
Rufe is a judge on the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:57 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Right to resist unlawful warrantless arrest Appellant, Donavan Walker, was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, (Klavans, J.) for resisting arrest and disorderly conduct, but found not guilty by the jury of three counts of assault in the second degree. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]