Search for: "West v. United States" Results 961 - 980 of 3,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sixteen states – including Louisiana, Texas, and West Virginia – took matters a step further and filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:33 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
 Recently, a United States federal court took a step to hold some of these companies responsible, for being at least complicit in a system supported by slavery, as the court put it in “receiving cocoa at a price that would not be obtainable without employing child slave labor. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
As its name suggests, the expropriation exception supplies federal courts with jurisdiction over certain cases concerning property taken by a foreign government: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case . . . in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property or any property exchanged for such property is present in the United… [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:03 am by Guest Blogger
Lumbermens appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which ultimately affirmed the District Court’s finding of coverage. [read post]