Search for: "v. Oliver"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm
Marys Cement v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
See People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
” The silica session was chaired by Christine Oliver, one of plaintiff’s key expert witnesses in Allen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 2:53 pm
In truth, based on my track record of never being able to stop talking or writing, this is unlikely but both barristers and writers are predisposed to angst so this is par for the course… Far more importantly on legal aid is IS v The Director of Legal Aid Casework & Anor [2015] EWHC 1965 (Admin) (15 July 2015), a humdinger of a judgment from Collins J basically trashing the whole exceptional funding scheme under s10 LASPO 2012. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. prophetically stated in his dissent from the infamous 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:39 am
As reviewed by this recent Forbes article, headlined "Big Court Defeat For Marijuana Despite Record Tax Harvests," the Ninth Circuit late last week in Olive v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 2:28 pm
Olive v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
., a controlled substance -- under federal law.Martin Olive has a couple of legal arguments as to why the statute shouldn't apply. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
. * Katz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Now, none of those cases were as important as Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:53 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Richardson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
Bloomer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:36 am
He also authored an amicus brief in NFIB v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm
., Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Northwest Territories have all found these provisions as unconstitutional, culminating in the Supreme Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Brendan Sullivan’s virulent, scorched-earth defense of Oliver North during the televised Iran/Contra hearings is the exception that proves the rule: in addition to the fact that Colonel North as a client offered his lawyers advantages and disadvantages peculiar only to Colonel North, Sullivan made a considered tactical decision that high-profile aggression was the appropriate tack in that particular public theater. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
Mickey Dinh, Santos Reyna, and Lo Dinh v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
