Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 29,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the ECJ has rendered its decision in Case C-498/16 Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
While many in the West used the opportunity of the Congress to engage in high level speculation about the politics embedded within the event (see, e.g., here, here, and here), few might have appreciated the significance of the 19th Congress for its contribution to the development of a Marxist-Leninist Constitutionalism with distinctly Chinese characteristics. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 11:36 am
Shammas v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
(the U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:15 am
In the recent case (MacKenzie v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:13 am
In 1992, the Supreme Court in Burson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Overall, this is a harmful trend characterized by excessive State responses. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:11 am
The Standard adds broader duties to promptly notify controllers when processors are “unable to offer an adequate level of security” or after they process the information entrusted to them other than strictly in accordance with the controller’s requirements. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Practically, that means that arguments should focus less on where the device is stored or found or used and more on what information the state is accessing. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:21 am
Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:21 am
Ortiz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
”A series of serious crimes widely described as “heinous” occurred in 1993 during the administration of President Fidel V. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:45 am
In the recent case of People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:18 pm
For Canada, in particular, strengthening legal protection for Internet platforms could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 12:13 pm
See Washington State Grange v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am
Moreover, Table A4 demonstrates that the 2006 treatment cohort that was subjected to the new training program had a lower grant rate relative to the 2006 control cohort that was not subject to the new training program (statistically significant at the 10 percent level or 1 percent level depending on the specification), consistent with expectations that the training would more strongly induce new hires to adopt the prevailing views promulgated by the agency heads at that time. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
No legal change will be required whatsoever – even on a domestic level. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 2:49 pm
” Despite the circuit split and legal uncertainty on the federal level, employers should be aware that many state and local laws offer protections against sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The chief justice announces that Sotomayor has the opinion today in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 8:33 am
” State v. [read post]
