Search for: "Million v. Million" Results 9781 - 9800 of 34,586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 7:17 am by John Jascob
It is the first conviction for securities fraud in connection with a municipal bond offering (U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The Board would not have been disinterested in considering demand because they faced possible personal liability for allowing his salary to continue to be paid (Feuer v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:49 am by Michael Risch
Examining 1.2 million granted and refused patent applications in the US, Europe (EPO), China, Japan, and South Korea, they think they have the answer. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The problem is that the court system is an unwieldy way to accomplish that, and defamation cases are often met with motion practice that will prolong the agony and cost you money and even more anguish.The case is Friedman v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Wang In April, we published an article about Fox Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Half of the 2.8 million boxes in question "contain records kept by district attorneys and courts. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 7:47 am by John Jascob
But the court said that it could not enforce a nonexistent deadline for distributing the settlement proceeds and that if the defendants wish to quash a subpoena, they should make a specific motion for that relief (SEC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:37 am by John Jascob
The SEC brought this action against the participants in boiler room scheme that took in approximately $44 million from penny stock sales to foreign investors. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:34 am by John Jascob
The court said that Citadel had not exhausted all available administrative remedies before turning to the courts for relief (Citadel Securities, LLC, v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reuters reported:At issue were $28 million in supplemental damages plus interest that a federal judge awarded to Dow for Nova's infringement of its patents from January 2010 to October 2011, when the patents expired.The court's action does not affect the $61 million in damages that a jury in 2010 awarded to Dow for Nova's infringement of the patents prior to 2010. [read post]