Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9781 - 9800 of 14,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:26 am
According to the New York law, "a court shall treat a foreign country as if it were a state of the United States". [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by David Fine
One of the federal contractors has stated that it is confident the contribution was legal under Citizens United, another plans to ask for its donation back, and the commission appears to be split on the issue. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm by Zachary Spilman
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is a case decided by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The Strasbourg authorities including Dickson v United Kingdom [2008] 1 F.L.R. 1315 and Hirst v United Kingdom (2006) 42 E.H.R.R. 41 indicated that Article 8 was engaged whenever a public authority applied a policy which restricted benefits to a particular class of people such as prisoners, and it was important to remember this principle, set out in Hirst and cited in Dickson: Nor is there any place under the Convention system, where tolerance and broadmindedness… [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Secret evidence Angus McCullough QC has posted a thoughtful post on the closed material procedures on the UKHRB and makes a number of excellent points, including that the proposed extension of closed procedures to civil proceedings is impelled not by considerations of national security but by considerations of fairness. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:38 am by SHG
United States, 267 U. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
” Additionally, when restrictive immigration laws in the 1920s closed the doors to Europe, the Mexican Revolution initiated the first large-scale immigration of Latinos across the border into the United States. [read post]