Search for: "House v. House" Results 9801 - 9820 of 41,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2013, 1:59 pm by SJM
Reading BC v Holt is an important case on the approach to be taken by the courts when making possession orders under Ground 16 of the Housing Act 1985.Mrs Holt has occupied 28 Southdown Rd, Emmer Green, Reading since her birth in 1953 and she became the successor tenant following the death of her mother on 24th July 2010. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
  Wandsworth accepted that they owed the full Part VII housing duty to Ms Mich-Onyibe. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 3:52 pm by Giles Peaker
One test for establishing succession to a secure tenancy by a gay partner (not being a civil partner) has been established since Nutting v Southern Housing Group Ltd [2004] EWHC 2982 (Ch). [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:41 pm
This was recently recognized in unambiguous terms by Lord Hoffman in his speech for the unanimous House of Lords in Stein v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:00 am
(C.D.Cal. 2005) 426 F.Supp.2d 1061, 1069 [housing rights center lost financial resources and diverted staff time investigating case against defendants]; Laster v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:33 am by Dan Bressler
’s request to have Convera’s Chief Legal Officer Brendan Clegg, other in-house attorneys and attorneys from Skadden disqualified from representing the company in the Chancery Court case “falls short” of the standard to warrant such action. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:25 am by Michael Bruno
  Most recently, Judge Feinberg in IC/L-A Washington Road, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:20 pm
The press release provides a link to the California case (Guy Montag Doe, et al., v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am by INFORRM
” He cited four privacy cases – McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73; HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57; Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103; and Murray v Express Newspapers [2009] Ch 481 – where the House of Lords had refused to grant permission to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]