Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 9801 - 9820 of 42,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2019, 2:51 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
We hope that our recommendations and discussion will serve as a call to action for further study and greater interest in strong cooperation at both institutional and repository levels, including collaborative action for multiple levels of collection assessments. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 3:58 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Motard c. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 2:53 am
It turned to CJEU C-65/12 Leidseplein Beheer [here], where the CJEU established that 'due cause' may also relate to the "subjective interests" of a third party using a trade mark or a similar sign. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:26 pm by Unknown
That those interested can promote their rehabilitation.Paragraph 6. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
Equally interesting, the same was true during my Clinton Board, when we used the most effective enforcement tool in the Act, Section 10(j), at historically unprecedented frequency. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:06 am by Tobias Lutzi
Alas, this appears to be the only instance in which the author’s comparative analysis, as interesting it is in and of itself, contributes to his broader point. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Forms 1040, 1041, 1065, 1120, 1120S, Schedules A, B, C, D, E, F and other worksheets. [read post]
An Up-C IPO refers to a transaction whereby a limited liability company (“LLC”), which is taxed as a pass-through entity, performs an IPO through a holding company that has an interest in the LLC. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
The limitation in subsection (2) should remain, thereby facilitating statutory copying and dissemination without otherwise derogating from the author’s copyright ownership interests. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
In addition, he should have good communication skills and explain matters relating to your case in a way you understand.Contact the Law Offices of Mark C. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms S – the interested party – was a tenant of NHG. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
(c) Any employer who violates this section shall be guilty of criminal contempt, and, upon conviction thereof, may be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days, or both. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:00 pm by Scott McKeown
¶ Were this Court to identify any Appointments Clause problem in the statutes governing APJs, the judiciary’s interest in maintaining the constitutional plan would be satisfied. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  She was also permitted to disclose information pursuant to clause 3(c) of the settlement agreement she had signed in 2018, which presumably permits disclosures to the police etc. [read post]