Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 178,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 3:37 pm
The Western District, Pennsylvania court held that Ohio plaintiff’s choice of forum of Pittsburgh, is to be given less deference when the plaintiff is not from that forum. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 11:49 pm
"Substantial evidence supported the district court's determination that defendant breached a duty of reasonable care to plaintiff by bringing his boat to planing speed when plaintiff was in a position of danger; neither did the court err in finding that defendant's negligence in operating the boat was a proximate and substantial cause of plaintiff's injuries; there is no well-settled admiralty rule authorizing … [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
In today’s case (Lo v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
It also deferred ruling on PJI’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims until the stay is lifted. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:01 am
Housewright also testified, stating that he hired plaintiff and that he was plaintiff’s “boss and/or supervisor. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Vermont then moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s action based on its claim that it was immune from private lawsuit. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:32 pm
Asher Hawkins over at Forbes On the Docket legal blog foresees trouble for class action plaintiffs in the Supreme Court's Latest Arbitration-Friendly Ruling. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:01 pm
Feb. 8, 2018), the California Magistrate Judge denied the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions, ruling that the defendants did not act with the intent to deprive there was no prejudice to the plaintiff from loss of videos and photos of an accident suffered by the plaintiff, a state prisoner at the defendant’s correctional facility. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:27 pm
As such, if a defendant successfully moves to preclude a plaintiff’s expert from testifying, it most likely will be devastating to the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
Barring such an express commitment, a plaintiff whose case is gutted by a third party's spoliation of evidence should focus on the above-described non-tort remedies. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
After the woman’s death, her estate (the plaintiff) filed a wrongful death claim against the nursing home, claiming that its negligence was the cause of woman’s death. [read post]
Ninth Circuit clarifies differences between proof of protectable trademark and proof of infringement
31 Dec 2007, 1:11 pm
A plaintiff must both prove that it has valid rights in a mark and that the defendant's use of its mark is likely to cause consumer confusion. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:13 am
Where plaintiff alleged that defendant attorneys ignored settlement offers and rejected offers on illogical bases in a previous class action case, dismissal of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim was reversed. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:39 am
" Plaintiffs also allege [plaintiffs] Ana Maria Ravines de Schur (Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:50 am
The plaintiff claims that the board improperly concluded that the commissioner did not abuse his discretion when he reduced the amount of attorney's fees awarded to the plaintiff from $1481 to $1. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:54 am
At issue is the city's application of its building code to plaintiffs' use of their home for weekly Bible studies for 35 people. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:28 pm
The jury found that the defendant was responsible for the plaintiff's injuries and awarded her a verdict in the amount of $1.5 million. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Australia's Daily Telegraph reported yesterday that a trial court judge in the Australian state of New South Wales has ruled that a Muslim woman who is plaintiff in a civil case against the state and federal governments may not take the stand in her own trial without removing her veil which conceals her face. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
Plaintiffs, an elderly couple, claim that statements made during a meeting of church members and before a synod review panel as part of the excommunication process injured their character and reputation in their small community. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 9:16 am
Aug. 11, 2008), the defendant removed, asserting that federal jurisdiction was proper because, among other things, CAFA’s $5,000,000 amount in controversy requirement was satisfied.In defending against the plaintiff’s motion to remand, the defendant presented two affidavits from its officers and one of the exhibits provided by the plaintiff. [read post]
