Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 40,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 7:40 am
In other words, let's say a State elects to increase its statewide sales tax, but decrease its income tax. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:32 am
See, e.g., Johnson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
” (Healy v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 9:26 am
I've gone back and reviewed the beginning of the tape and, sure enough, Judge Pooler states that Judge Sach (sp?) [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
The answer lies in the word "arbitration. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:10 am
Or so said a majority of the court, in almost the exact same words, when it invalidated a death-penalty-for-rape in Coker v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:05 am
State, 961 S.W.2d 282, 284 (Tex.App. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
The legislative intent of §36, said the court, was “to enable a town or village to rid itself of an unfaithful or dishonest public official," citing Matter of Miller v Filion, 304 AD2d 1016.In the words of the court, “It is firmly established that removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 is unwarranted in the absence of allegations of "self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or… [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:05 am
State, 961 S.W.2d 282, 284 (Tex.App. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:37 pm
In other words, this case is not ready for judicial review. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:10 am
“The Court interpreted the State Human Rights Law to hold that an employee could not be terminated for alcohol-related chronic absenteeism where (1) he had established a causal link between his alcoholism and misconduct and (2) had demonstrated that, as of the time of termination, he was rehabilitated. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 am
Ritter's letter suggests that the Court's 2005 decision in Van Orden v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:07 pm
Perrigo Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:57 am
The ECJ’s ruling stated: “The German and United Kingdom Governments further observe that ‘investment advice’, defined in Article 4(1)(4) of Directive 2004/39 and listed in point 5 of Section A of Annex I thereto, consists, according to the wording of Article 52 of Directive 2006/73, in recommending the completion of a transaction in relation to a particular financial instrument. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
See Ellis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
One was a figurative mark (as represented on the right), the other being a word mark. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 2:24 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
She stated, at paras. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:43 am
United States (1994); D.C. v. [read post]
