Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 4:14 am
--one notes the patent was found valid, but not infringed.The Washington Times article "soft-pedals" the "loser pays" provision of the Innovation Act:The bill also opens the door to a requirement that plaintiffs pay legal bills of the defendants if they lose.The bill does not "open the door. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:02 am
The Court ordered that "each defendant" run a television ad telling the truth about cigarettes once per week for a year, but RJR asserts that because it merged with B&W pre-judgment, the ruling does not apply to that company. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:03 am
"[Defendant] alleges that the asserted claims of [a patent-in-suit] are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:58 pm
Judge Richard Posner, writing for the court, does not say much about the underlying lawsuit, except that it consists of both class action and collective action claims. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:07 am
"The distinction that the defendants draw between the Supreme Court’s standard and the standard articulated in [plaintiff's expert's] declaration is a narrow one. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:09 am
David Deininger, the retired appeals court judge who chaired the board during the launching of the John Doe investigation, defended [GAB chief counsel Kevin Kennedy and Jonathan Becker, administrator of the agency’s ethics and accountability division]. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 5:41 am
The defendants are a playboy playmate and her husband. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 7:11 am
However, to ensure no 'gaming' of the process, the Court does not require the parties to meet and confer on claim construction. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner's allegations of employment discrimination based on events that occurred before April 8, 2011 are time-barred under the applicable three-year statute of limitations [see CPLR 214[2]; Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-502[d] and the Continuous Violation Doctrine does not apply in this instance; and2. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
Tracelink further asserted that Unisone "does not even allege that [Defendant] had knowledge of the '538 patent." [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:31 am
Plaintiff’s argument that such opinions are supported by substantial evidence and reasoned analysis does not change the fact that they are intrinsically impermissible. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Insurance in its most common form (and certainly the policies Federal wrote here) does two things: 1) indemnify someone, or some business, for judgments or settlements against them in civil cases, and 2) defend someone, or some business – or pay defense costs in civil (and, in rare cases, criminal) matters. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:36 pm
Moreover, passengers sixteen years and older must report such an accident if the driver does not. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:54 pm
The statute does not restrict jurisdiction to changes. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
On the other hand, if the employer does not request an examination, the seaman must disclose medical facts that, in the seaman’s own opinion, would be considered important by the ship-owner. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
While the DCCPPA authorizes private attorney general suits, it does not contain any class action procedures. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:39 pm
Although the Preliminary Report, so far as I can see, does not spell this out, it seems clear that it is intended that fixed costs would apply to claimant solicitors but not defendant ones. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 5:25 am
How Does a Defendant Raise the Issue of Incompetence to Stand Trial? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:29 am
Quoting Wilson, the court held: “Admission by defense counsel of an element of a crime charged, while still maintaining the defendant’s innocence, does not necessarily amount to a Harbison error. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:48 pm
Short, 401 U.S. 319 (1970), holding unconstitutional the imprisonment of a defendant who does not pay his fine because he is unable to. [read post]
