Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 28,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2017, 5:53 am
This is subject to the parties having been given the right to be heard on the new case law, if it is presented for the first time before the GC.This is precisely what occurred in case T-453/11, Szajner v OHMI - Forge de Laguiole (LAGUIOLE) [reported by The IPKat here]. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:00 am
” F.T.C. v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
(People v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:00 am
Applying the Pell Doctrine in a disciplinary actionSullivan v County of Rockland, 2017 NY Slip Op 03519, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDisciplinary penalties imposed on public employees in New York State must meet the test set out in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:35 am
As such, it could enjoy the freedom to provide its services and not be subject to the relevant local regulations of the various Member States regarding taxi services.As to the final question, readers will be aware that in certain Member States there has been some resistance towards accepting that Uber can provide its services there. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:15 am
A lawsuit filed late last year against a major media company in California, Taylor v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:22 am
The State Bar of Texas polices its own. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
In light of those immunity doctrines and the unique structural role and constitutional status of the President of the United States, the Court concluded that Nixon was “entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
Of the thirteen judges at the hearing in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:36 am
Forest Oil Corporation v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:36 am
Forest Oil Corporation v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
That was the issue before Arnold J. in his latest judgment considering the SPC Regulation in (1) Sandoz Limited (2) Hexal AG v (1) G.D. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:37 am
In Cruce v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:01 pm
”Rizo v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:36 am
” In light of these statements from the Second Circuit, lower courts have started to accept that federal law does, in fact, prohibit sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:20 am
The Appellate Division affirmed.J.I. v. [read post]
